Behaviour and Welfare of Dairy Buffaloes: Pasture or Confinement?

Authors

  • Patricia Mora-Medina Livestock Science Department, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), FESC, State of Mexico, Mexico
  • Jesús Alfredo Berdugo-Gutiérrez Latin American Center for the Study of Buffalo, Colombia
  • Daniel Mota-Rojas Neurophysiology, Behavior and Assessment of Welfare in Domestic Animals, Department of Animal Production and Agriculture, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City, 04960, Mexico
  • Jhon Didier Ruiz-Buitrago Grupo de Investigación INCACES, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad CES, Medellin, Colombia
  • José Nava-Adame Neurophysiology, Behavior and Assessment of Welfare in Domestic Animals, Department of Animal Production and Agriculture, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City, 04960, Mexico
  • Isabel Guerrero-Legarreta Department of Biotechnology, Food Science, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, (UAM-I), México City, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2018.07.03.2

Keywords:

Buffaloes, behaviour, welfare, extensive system, intensive system.

Abstract

This review seeks to integrate recent scientific findings on the behaviour of buffalo cows in different production systems. These issues are discussed in relation to the level of welfare that buffalo cows experience under different production systems. In extensive conditions, the level of welfare is high because the animals are free to express natural behaviours related to feeding (grazing, ruminating) and rest. In contrast, intensified livestock-raising methods and techniques (machine-milking, artificial breeding etc.), first developed for dairy cattle are increasingly being used with water buffaloes in order to increase milk production. Greater knowledge of the biology of dairy buffaloes in aspects linked to physiology, behaviour, and health, together with needed adjustments to their production systems, will indicate options for improving the levels of comfort and welfare of these animals and contribute to increasing the efficiency of this type of dairy production. It is necessary to appreciate the importance of welfare within the entire chain of animal production since each of the scientific aspects considered in this manuscript reflects that animal welfare is not an absolute term, but multidisciplinary, with direct consequences on productivity. The welfare of animals in the production systems must be considered with the aim of ensuring an adequate nutritional, clinical, sanitary and behavioural status of the animals. When these aspects are achieved, production can be maximized and, for this reason, it is essential to maintain a balance between welfare and productivity.

References

Mota-Rojas D, De Rosa G, Mora-Medina P, Braghieri A, Gerrero-Legarreta I, Napolitano F. Invited review: Dairy buffalo behaviour and welfare from calving to milking. CAB Rev 2018; 13: 1-11.

Mota-Rojas D, Velarde A, Roldan P, Ceballos MC, Cajiao-Pachón MN, Borderas F. Animal welfare and productivity. In: Mota-Rojas D, Velarde-Calvo A, Maris-Huertas S, Nelly-Cajiao M, editors. Bienestar Animal una visión global en Iberoamérica. [Animal welfare, a global vision in Ibero-America]. 3rd ed. Barcelona, España: Elsevier 2016; pp. 171-84.

Fraser D. Animal welfare assurance programs in food production: a framework for assessing the options. Anim Welf 2006; 15(2): 93.

Broom DM, Corke MJ. Effects of disease on farm animal welfare. Acta Vet Brno 2002; 71: 133-6. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200271010133

Broom DM, Galindo FA, Murgueitio E. Sustainable, efficient livestock production with high biodiversity and good welfare for animals. Biol Sci 2013; 280: 201-25. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2025

Grandin T. Transferring results of behavioral research to industry to improve animal welfare on the farm, ranch and the slaughter plant. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003; 81: 215-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00282-4

Mota-Rojas D, Ceballos MC, Orihuela A, Corredor MC, Pérez-Pedraza E, Ramírez R. Painful practices in farm animals. In: Mota-Rojas D, Velarde-Calvo A, Maris-Huertas S, Nelly-Cajiao M, editors. Bienestar Animal una visión global en Iberoamérica. [Animal welfare, a global vision in Ibero-America]. 3rd ed. Barcelona, España: Elsevier 2016; pp. 137-54.

Borghese A. Buffalo Livestock and Products in Europe. Buffalo Bull 2013; 32: 50-74.

Borghese A, Rasmussen M, Thomas CS. Milking management of dairy buffalo. Ital J Anim Sci 2007; 6(Suppl 2): 39-50. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.s2.39

De Rosa G, Bordi A, Napolitano F, Bilancione A, Grasso F. Effect of housing system on behavioural activity of lactating buffaloes. Ital J Anim Sci 2007; 6: 506-8.

De Rosa G, Grasso F, Pacelli C, Napolitano F, Winckler C. The welfare of dairy buffalo. Ital J Anim Sci 2009; 8: 103-16. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.103

De Rosa G, Grasso F, Braghieri A, Bilancione A, Di Francia A, Napolitano F. Behavior and milk production of buffalo cows as affected by housing system. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 907-12. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1157

Napolitano F, Pacelli C, Grasso F, Braghieri A, De Rosa G. The behaviour and welfare of buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) in modern dairy enterprises. Animal 2013; 7: 1704-13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001109

Turner SP, Dwyer CM. Welfare assessment in extensive animal production systems: challenges and opportunities. Anim Welf 2007; 16: 189-92.

Veissier I, Butterworth A, Bock B, Roe E. European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008; 113: 279-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.008

Tripaldi C, De Rosa G, Grasso F, Terzano GM, Napolitano F. Housing system and welfare of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) cows. Anim Sci 2004; 78: 477-83.

Napolitano F, Knierim U, Grasso F, De Rosa G. Positive indicators of cattle welfare and their applicability to on-farm protocols. Ital J Anim Sci 2009; 8: 355-65. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.355

Napolitano F, De Rosa G, Grasso F, Wemelsfelder F. Qualitative behaviour assessment of dairy buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Appl Anim Behav Sci 2012; 141: 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.08.002

Napolitano F, Grasso F, Bordi A, Tripaldi C, Saltalamacchia F, Pacelli C, et al. On-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle and buffaloes: evaluation of some animal-based parameters. Ital J Anim Sci 2005; 4: 223-31. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2005.223

Fericean LM. Observations regarding the buffalo's behavior raising in extensive system. Res J Agr Sci 2016; 48: 42-9.

Koga A. Effects of high environmental temperatures on some physicochemical parameters of blood and heat production in swamp buffaloes and Holstein cattle. Anim Sci Tech 1991; 62: 1022-8.

Lopes F, Coblentz W, Hoffman PC, Combs DK. Assessment of heifer grazing experience on short-term adaptation to pasture and performance as lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 3138-52. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6125

Penati C, Berentsen PBM, Tamburini A, Sandrucci A, de Boer IJM. Effect of abandoning highland grazing on nutrient balances and economic performance of Italian Alpine dairy farms. Livest Sci 2011; 139: 142-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.008

Sabia E, Napolitano F, De Rosa G, Terzano GM, Barile V, Braghieri A, et al. Efficiency to reach age of puberty and

behaviour of buffalo heifers (Bubalus bubalis) kept on pasture or in confinement. Animal 2014; 8: 1907-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114001876

Nilsson H, Tuncer B, Thidell A. The use of eco-labeling like initiatives on food products to promote quality assurance—is there enough credibility? J Clean Prod 2004; 12: 517-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(03)00114-8

Sabia E, Napolitano F, Claps S, De Rosa G, Barile VL, Braghieri A, et al. Environmental impact of dairy buffalo heifers kept on pasture or in confinement. Agr Syst 2018; 159: 42-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.010

Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Oppermann M, Spruijt B, Keeling L, et al. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol Behav 2007; 92: 375-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003

Sant'Anna AC, Da Costa M, Pascoa AG, Silva LC, Jung J. Assessing land use by cattle in heterogeneous environments. Cienc Rural 2015; 45: 470-3. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20131576

Paranhos da Costa MJ, Tarazona Morales AM. Practical approach on how to improve the welfare in cattle. Rev Col Cienc Pec 2011; 24: 347-59.

Thomas CS. Milking management of dairy buffaloes. [dissertation]. Doctoral Thesis. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences 2004.

Thomas CS, Nordstrom J, Svennersten-Sjaunja K, Wiktorsson H. Maintenance and milking behaviours of Murrah buffaloes during two feeding regimes. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005; 91: 261-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.002

Cavallina R, Roncoroni C, Campagna MC, Minero M, Canali E. Buffalo behavioural response to machine milking in early lactation. Ital J Anim Sci 2008; 7: 287-95. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2008.287

Stafford KJ, Gregory NG. Implications of intensification of pastoral animal production on animal welfare. New Zealand Vet J 2008; 56: 274-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2008.36847

Kalsi JS, Randhawa SS, Randhawa SS. Clinical and haemato-biochemical studies on overgrown hooves in dairy buffaloes. Indian J Anim Sci 2002; 72: 543-45.

Loberg J, Telezhenko E, Bergsten C, Lidfors L. Behaviour and claw health in tied dairy cows with varying access to exercise in an outdoor paddock. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2004; 89: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.04.009

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Behaviour and Welfare of Dairy Buffaloes: Pasture or Confinement?. (2018). Journal of Buffalo Science, 7(3), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2018.07.03.2

Similar Articles

1-10 of 159

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)